Everyone says your idea is great.
The board won't.
Three AI experts interrogate your idea one question at a time, argue about it out loud, and hand down a scored verdict with a fix list. The score is math — the board can't be sweet-talked.
Start my interviewName the actual human who has this problem. Not "founders like me" — a name.
"AI-native builders. They want honesty, ChatGPT just agrees with—"
That's a category, not a person. Who told you — in their own words — that this gap cost them something real?
"...honestly? No paying user yet."
Exactly what happens when you click
The interrogation
A partner, a skeptic investor, and a customer advocate question you in turn. First answers get pushed on — the board assumes they're the polished version.
The deliberation
Each scores your idea independently, then the two who disagree most argue it out — in front of you.
The verdict
Pass or fail on four weighted dimensions, the answer that cost you most, and a concrete fix list.
Why this exists — a note from the builder
ChatGPT told me every idea I've ever had was great. In one published test it approved 3 out of 3 startup ideas that a purpose-built evaluator killed 2 of. That's not validation — that's encouragement.
So I built a board that can't flatter me: the verdict is computed from the panel's scores, and the model literally cannot override it. First thing I did was pitch it its own business plan. It failed me, 4.9/10, and the fix list was right.
— the builder, after losing to his own product
The questions you're already asking
Isn't this just ChatGPT with a prompt?
No. Three personas score independently against a fixed rubric, are forced to disagree out loud, and the pass/fail gate is deterministic math. Outputs that flatter get detected and regenerated. You can't charm a weighted average.
What do you do with my idea?
It stays private unless you choose to share your verdict. We ask for your email once — right before the verdict reveal — so we can send you your copy.
What if the board is wrong?
It might be. It's one brutal, structured opinion in 15 minutes — cheaper than building the wrong thing for three months to find out.